Category: Other Homework Help

I’m working on a other presentation and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

I need a PowerPoint file to present materials that show an influence of the film or some art that the film influenced in “I am not a witch” movie.

The file attached below is an excel spreadsheet that needs to be filled out, fairly simple, will not take longer than an hour. ONLY COMPLETE UP UNTIL COLUMN i. After column i, do not fill anything in. PLEASE USE FORMULAS WHEN YOU INPUT, DO NOT SIMPLY WRITE INTO THE CELLS. THIS TEACHER READS EXCEL VERY WELL. I ALREADY COMPLETED SOME OF IT. This assignment is fairly easy and uses the same formula for multiple columns. SEE ATTACHED FILE BELOW

I’m working on a research & summaries question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Discussion question 4 paragraphs (1) Mueller et al. (2011) outline some of the positive outcomes from activity involvement (including how they pan out with the 4-H PYD study towards end of chapter) as well as features of activity involvement. Describe positive outcomes from youth participation in OST that are of interest to you and how they may be indicators of thriving. Also, what is the relationship between Search Institute developmental assets (or nutrients) and out of school time activity participation in PYD programs for youth?

(3) Lynch and colleagues (2016) explore youth program engagement in OST (Scouts) and examine both youth engagement as individuals and youth engagement collectively (pack-level). Why might it be important to examine both individual and collective (pack) levels of youth involvement in Scouts and what were the findings with respect to influences of group and individual engagement on the PYD outcome of moral or performance character development? What did you find different about Lynch and colleagues’ (2016) use and type of measures of activity involvement, as compared with other studies of youth program engagement? (for example, their use of measures of characteristics of involvement such as intensity, duration and engagement at both the individual and collective/pack levels)

Select a work-related ethical scenario that you (or someone close to you) have experienced. Organizations and names should be changed when identifying references in the assignment. Compose an essay that addresses the following requirements:

Identify the key positions, titles, and assigned responsibilities in the organization.

Discuss and illustrate the individual pressures faced and how the issues were handled or delegated to another position.

Introduction– Discuss the purpose of the work, answer the following questions, State as accurately as possible the author’s purpose for writing the article, what key question/s is the author addressing?

Discussion– Discuss the author’s major findings as reported in the article, answer the following questions, The most important information in this article is what? (Figure out the facts, data the author is using to support his/her conclusions.), The main inferences/conclusions in this article is (are)?, (Identify the key conclusions the author comes to and presents in the article), The key concept(s) we need to understand in this article is (are)?(Figure out the most important ideas you would have to understand in order to understand the author’s line of reasoning), The main assumption(s) underlying the author’s thinking is (are)?(Figure out what the author is taking for granted, that might be questioned)

Reflective Commentary– As a student in the field of Legal Liability, what are your thoughts about this article? Answer the following questions, If we take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are? (What consequences are likely to follow if people take the author’s line of reasoning?), If we fail to take this line of reasoning seriously, the implications are? (What consequences are likely to follow if people ignore the author’s reasoning?), The main point(s) of view presented in this article is (are)? (What is the author looking at, and how is she/he seeing it?)

Write this in your own words, first person. You may also relate to your own experiences, etc. when you are doing this critique. It should be no less than two full pages in length, double-spaced. Format of critique should include Introduction, Discussion, and Reflective Commentary

Reply:

Redistricting and Gerrymandering

Redistricting determines what district people live in, and decides which political party controls those districts. It plays a major part in national, statewide, and local voting. Censuses help legislators redraw their district boundaries by providing them with information on the districts’ demographics. Without information from the censuses, legislators cannot redistrict, since they lack information about the population in a demographic. Gerrymandering is a process that legislators use to gain an advantage over another party. Political gerrymandering occurs when political parties pack supporters of the opposing political party into each district, so the opposing political party receives less House seats. Redistricting differs from gerrymandering in that redistricting is a fair way of representing the population, while the process of gerrymandering is used to manipulate the outcome of elections.

The 2020 census will help legislators determine the new districts affecting national, state, and local voting. Redistricting is expected to be challenging, with the recent population changes due to COVID-19. Based on the census, in 2022, Texas will gain two new congressional seats due to the increase in population. Legislators predict republicans will hold the majority of Texas seats for the next 10 years, holding 23 out of 36 seats.

In 2013, the Voting Rights Act was repealed, freeing the state from preclearance and possibly leading to an increase in gerrymandering. The Voting Rights Act was established 50 years ago to prevent legislators from gerrymandering. However, The Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Holder that the act was unconstitutional and was removed (110). The Voting Rights Act required Texas legislators to bring any redistricting changes to the Supreme Court for permission, to reduce gerrymandering. I believe that repealing the act could lead to increased gerrymandering, since there is no way to restrict legislators from manipulating the districts in favor of him or her.

Due to the pandemic, the census was delayed approximately 4 months. Even with the census delay, the 87th Texas Legislative session was held on schedule, however, redistricting did not take place. Special legislative sessions were held afterwards to complete redistricting, but legislators are worried the 2022 election cycle might be affected by the census delay. In 2012, the deadlines were moved for potential election candidates. The setback doubled the length of campaigns and caused chaos for fundraising and the election. Legislators fear that history might repeat itself in the coming election.

As a Texas citizen, I believe that politicizing districts to garner votes from specific types of people is unjust. I think the government should reflect the population, and gerrymandering districts to gain votes is causing Texan legislators to not exemplify the residents of the districts they are representing. Congressional District 35 has been a leading example of gerrymandering in Texas, seeking out the places highly populated with Hispanics, and redistricting the county boundaries to envelope those areas. Dogget (D) raised the Hispanic population of CD-35 to 50% in an attempt to keep the district on the Democratic side.

My overall thought on redistricting and gerrymandering is that redistricting is necessary to evolve districts to reflect its residents, and gerrymandering prevents legislators from accurately representing the population. Without accurate representation in the House, Texas residents will not be able to influence decisions made in the House. However, I do not believe politicians should be taken out of the redistricting process since there needs to be fair legislators. Removing the legislators from the redistricting process would prevent residents from seeing which legislators want to represent the people, or care about publicity. I do believe there should be a process that the redistricting changes must go through before becoming final, such as a Supreme Court review process.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Assignment Content

1. 
   
   Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you identify, compare, and contrast the policing function at the local, state, and federal organizational levels. Analyze how the organizational, management, administration, and operational functions at these three organizational levels are similar or different and why. Be sure to identify the leadership characteristics and responsibilities pertaining to each organizational level.

   Include at least four peer reviewed references.

   Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

   Assignment Content

   1. 
      
      Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper identifying and evaluating the constitutional safeguards provided by the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments to the United States Constitution as they apply to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. Discuss the impact that these safeguards (e.g., Right to Counsel, Miranda Warnings, speedy trial, the exclusionary rule, etc.) have on the day-to- day operation of adult and juvenile courts.

      Include at least four peer reviewed references.

      Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

      
      

   In a separate paragraph explain the following;

   
   Discuss and evaluate how the diverse roles of judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, and other courtroom personnel are both independent and mutually interdependent as well as the benefits and pitfalls of such relationships.

   
   

The goal of this project is to develop a data management plan (DMP) for either a research project or another client organisation, to be provided to the client for implementation.  You may otherwise solicit your own client (e.g., a current or previous employer, a personal project, an organisation you are familiar with, a company, etc)

If you choose the research data management plan option: You will interview a researcher (PI, principal investigator, or whomever is running the project) about their research plans, specifically probing to discover their data management needs. You will use what you learn from the PI to develop a funder-compliant data management plan that is compliant with the funder if there is funding. If the funder does not currently require a data management plan, ensure that the plans you develop adhere to the best practices in the PI’s field of practice.

In addition to an implementation-ready data management plan, you must prepare a “budget advisory” document and a timeline for implementation tasks. The budget advisory document must include an itemised list of all expected expenses for supporting the data management plan, including (but not limited to) the staff time, tools and infrastructure, licenses, and any other related fees. Note that you will not need to include specific Euro figures (although estimates are fine), but will need to specify every item that must be budgeted in order to fully support the data management plan as specified. The timeline of implementation tasks must illustrate when key tasks must be completed to fully support the data management plan as specified.

Your final project will include (I expect it will be about 12 pages + appendices)

• Analysis of the client and the project/organisation
• Your method/tools for getting requirements and your analysis of the client’s needs
• The tools you use for generating a data management plan and how you used them
• Your actual plan and recommendations
• Budget/timeline
• APA Bibliography

Service Evaluation Plan Using RISE

If you choose the service evaluation plan option:  Using the RISE framework, evaluate the institution you are working for to assess its current state of support for research data management. Using the RISE framework, your task is to set the scope/context, classify current support, design future services, and create a report and recommendations. You should interview as many stakeholders as possible to get a collaborative picture of RDM situation at your institution/organisation. You should interview at least one individual from two of the following groups: researchers, IT support, librarians, research officers. If you are working in one of these roles you can self-interview.  

The key component of RISE is benchmarking: Collaborative Assessment of Research Data Infrastructure and Objectives (CARDIO). Although it is focused on the UK, you can use the CARDIO RDM Matrix to select 1 from each group to evaluate in your organisation and to structure your conversations with staff: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/events/EPSRC-workshop/CARDIO_matrix_EPSRC.pdf

RISE citation. Rans, J and Whyte, A. (2017). ‘Using RISE, the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation Framework’ v.1.1 Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides

I’m working on a Research & Summaries question and need guidance to help me study.

Just looking for the key themes and a bit of a critique for this article:

Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., Jonas, K., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Van Dick, R. (2012). How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self?determination?based analysis of employees’ needs as mediating links. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1771