Tag: Law

Answer this question in 300 words with references.

1- How would you characterize the difference between the US approach to protecting privacy versus many other countries, such as Canada, Australia, and the European Union?  Do you think self-regulation is sufficient to protect privacy or are more regulations needed?

2- Reply to 3 student posts 

This is the first student’s discussion you have to reply in 150 words:

The United States has elected for a diverse tactic to data protection. As an alternative to formulating one all-encompassing guideline such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the US chose to implement sector-specific privacy and data protection regulations that work together with state laws to safeguard American citizens’ data. Other countries such as Australia use the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) that apply equally to all sectors. While the US needs an individual’s permission to send direct marketing material, the Australian model at times overwrites these rules and can send direct marketing material without consulting with the individual. Self-regulation has failed to fully protect the private data of consumers worldwide. It is evident that more regulations and tighter penalties should be put in place to scare away violators of such rules.

Reference

Ang, P. H. (2001). The Role of Self-regulation of Privacy and the Internet. Journal of Interactive advertising, 1(2), 1-9.

Term Paper Topic

Organized Crime And The Internet. 

This is the second student’s discussion you have to reply in 150 words:

The difference between the US and European Union (EU) in protecting privacy is that in the US there is no federal regulation or law as in the EU.

In the US, there is no comprehensive privacy legislation, but several regulations that target certain sectors, and these regulations were created after an event that happened, so the legislation is reactive in protecting citizens. These regulations were created before 2000, right in the internet boom, and in my humble opinion, these regulations did not catch up with the current state of data privacy meaning that we have now 2021! Terms and ideas as data mining and machine learning were not something that these laws were thinking of at that time.

In the EU there is legislation specifically to protect privacy, which is considered a basic human right. It is called General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a cross-sectoral legislation. Its purpose is to solidify user’s right to exercise their control over the extraction and use of their data.

In the US, it is difficult to discern a pattern or a plan in legislation because privacy law’s appeared after events, in a more reactive way, different than the EU regulation.

In Brazil, there was a federal law called Marco Civil da Internet (Civil Law of the Internet) that gave rights and obligations to users and companies regarding the use of the internet and data. However, this law was replaced by another one, based on the European one, GDPR, called Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados do Brasil (General Data Protection Law of Brazil). US-based companies operating in Brazil had to change their privacy policies because of the new regulation imposed by the Brazilian regulation.

I don’t believe that self-regulation is sufficient to protect privacy. As Spinello (2020) mentioned, companies such as Facebook would need to change their business model because they use big data to improve their ad sales, which are made using users’ activity track by cookies in many network platforms, even when not using Facebook. There are also companies that only collect data from people and sell it online. If there is no legal penalty to such an act, this line of business is legal and legitimate. Why would the market force something? In regards to the public, the public does not use this company’s product but other companies to sell or make a transaction. Therefore, the market won’t regulate itself. For users to push for regulation of this practice, collective knowledge is necessary but people are mostly unaware of how data is collected, processed, and sold – I had no knowledge of how cookies for tracking user’s browser activity worked before coming to this class, and I am a CS student :(. One point Spinello mentioned and I agree is that code can be used to regulate privacy with the use of ad blocks, cleaning of cookies, or using browsers that put privacy first (Brave is an awesome alternative, that blocks trackers and you can even select which to turn on or off – very user-friendly). But still, there are companies that I need their services like Google for emailing, so I do not have an opinion but to keep using them and trust them.

So I believe self-regulation is not sufficient, because of the unawareness of users, the business model of many companies, and user’s lack of power of accessing or knowing whatever data companies have, how they use it, and whom they sell data to. Consequently, it is difficult to protect or try to block something invisible. Sometimes we need the government to regulate practices and protect the citizens, even when they don’t know that they are victims!

References:

• Spinello, Richard (Boston College). Cyber Ethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace (Seventh Edition). Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2020
• Carson, A. (2021, July 20). Data privacy laws: What you need to know in 2021. Osano – Articles Essentials. Available at https://www.osano.com/articles/data-privacy-laws
• Green, A. (2021, April 04). Complete Guide to Privacy Laws in the US. Varonis – Compliance & Regulations. Available at https://www.varonis.com/blog/us-privacy-laws/
• TJDFT – Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal e dos Territórios. Marco Civil da Internet (2015)- Compliance & Regulations. Available at https://www.tjdft.jus.br/institucional/imprensa/campanhas-e-produtos/direito-facil/edicao-semanal/marco-civil-da-internet
• Ideacao Inovacao em Gestao Publica. Como o Brasil e outros países estão protegendo os dados dos cidadãos? (2019). Available at https://blogs.iadb.org/brasil/pt-br/como-o-brasil-e-outros-paises-estao-protegendo-os-dados-dos-cidadaos/

This is the third student’s discussion you have to reply in 150 words:

Privacy can be protected through industry self-regulation; however, FTC does not recommend this legislation at this time. Furthermore, studies suggest that there has not been an effective self-regulation system to protect consumer privacy online.

In the United States, the self-regulation legislation only exists in certain industries. But, each industry is different and some industries’ data repositories are not being regulated. In contrast, in the E.U., there is a very extensive regulation on all fronts.

When it comes to protecting privacy, the approach that the United States takes is greatly different from the European Union. The United States puts more emphasis on self-regulation, which means companies only need to give out notices about the privacy they promise. These companies would get penalized by the FTC if they do not keep their promises. But, FTC’s power to protect people only applies to the promises made by companies. In many cases, people only are given the right to choose not to participate in whether their data can be used, but are not given the right to limit which companies cannot collect their data. However, the rules in the E.U. are very strict when it comes to collecting, using, and disclosing personal information; these companies require personal consent.

Additionally, these philosophies adopted by the U.S. and the E.U. could be attributed to the following reasons. Firstly,

the United States is a country which is constituted by fifty states, while the European Union is a governing body which is comprised of different countries. Because of this difference between the two, the federal government’s power in the United States is different from the power in the European Union. In the U.S., companies are being protected by the federal government. On the other hand, in the E.U., they value individual’s rights above companies. That is why it is easier for U.S. companies to fire someone than it is in E.U. Also, this might explain why in the United States the healthcare industry is for profit. Additionally, the historic backgrounds of the E.U. and the U.S could be another reason why both governments take the approaches to protect privacy differently. More specifically, this could be rooted in each legal system. The E.U. has the Civil Law system while the U.S. has the Common Law system.

Reference:

Solove, D. (2012, Oct 23). On Privacy, why is the EU so different from the US? Available at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20121023040724-2259… 

• Essay
• 1 pages
  • 1 double-spaced page = 300 words
  • 1 slide = 150 words
  • 60 minutes – 300 words
• Law and International Law
• USE APA FORMATTING STYLE
• USE APPROPRIATE SOURCES NO SPECIFIC SOURCES WERE PROVIDED
• Dear Writer,
  please write a journal entry accordingly to the next instructions:
  Before writing this entry, reflect on what you learned from reading Chapters 1 through 3 of the Emotional Intelligence 2.0 text, and the thoughts and approaches that Jason Bridges shared in the video.
  Finally, consider what you’ve heard and learned this week and use that information when you consider the results of your EI assessment.
  Then, write your entry addressing the following: How do you currently exercise EI personally and professionally? Describe any areas you would like to improve.

you must have responded to the question below with an original post and responded to another student’s post using information we have covered during this week. Please write at least 4 – 6 sentences for each original post and 2- 4 sentences in your responses.

Discussion Board Questions:

After reading the assigned text and articles for this week, answer one of the following questions in your own words using support from the readings and your own opinion:

• What are mandatory arrest policies and how are they used for incidents of domestic violence? Do you think they have helped victims of intimate partner violence? Why or why not?

OR 

• Briefly describe two of the barriers that can prevent victims of intimate partner abuse from reporting their victimization to police or seeking support. How can we reduce these barriers and increase reporting and support seeking?

Post

One barrier is the language barrier of immigrants or people who don’t have English as a first language. They aren’t able to properly get help as it is unlikely they’d be somewhere they could be fully and properly understood. A fairly simple solution would be to have as many people of different race, ethnicity, and language capability at these support services. As well as advertising these services everywhere and in any way possible in these languages. Another barrier is that women don’t feel that the justice system takes these matters seriously, and we have seen several instances where this is true. They either aren’t believed, or they’re blamed, or their abuser doesn’t get a worthy punishment if even that. These places are supposed to be safe for women and for the people, yet some are victimized twice – once by their abuser, twice by the system. Officers should be trained in how to properly approach these situations, and the justice system needs to start taking these matters more seriously and give proper punishment to those deserving. 

The US electrical grid is vast and complicated. We can all flip a switch to turn on the lights, but don’t appreciate the huge infrastructure that gives us light, heat, and all of the electronics we rely on every day (and right now if you are reading this!) Here are some resources to consider the grid:

• California Independent System Operator: Today’s Outlook (Links to an external site.)
  • Notice that you can see the renewable sources contributing to the grid at any given time. Look at the “net demand” graph at the bottom, which shows you how much of current demand is met by renewables wind and solar.
• Oregon Department of Energy, Biennial Energy Report: By the Numbers (2020)

Explore the resources and consider:

• What are the costs and benefits to society of adding more renewable energy to the grid? What can we change about the grid to get the benefits and overcome the costs?
• How do regulatory interests balance shorter term safety, reliability, and costs with longer term environmental impacts in the electricity sector?
• What further questions do you have about the electrical grid for our future?

Reply to the following prompt on intentional torts

DAVE works in an office with PAT, the elderly wife of a pastor at a local church. PAT was going to have a birthday and, as is the custom at their place of work, several office employees, including DAVE, take PAT to lunch.

At the restaurant during PAT’s birthday luncheon, PAT wore a yellow hat and sat at the head of a long table. Unknown to everyone else, DAVE arranged for a male stripper to attend the luncheon and dance to taped music while suggestively undressing in front of PAT. DAVE called the business that supplies male strippers and requested that a stripper be provided who would “give her a thrill”. DAVE paid the stripper’s fee.

During the birthday meal, a handsome man appeared and, as the taped music began to play, he began to dance near PAT while taking off his clothes. He continued to disrobe down to a very small undergarment covering only his genitals. He removed PAT’s yellow hat and placed it on his own head. While the music continued to play, he danced close to PAT and accidentally touched her twice, very lightly. The others present were amused by the performance, including the restaurant staff who gathered in a crowd at the room’s exit. PAT remained seated and absolutely still during the entire performance.

PAT now states that, since she was “trapped and surprised” at her birthday luncheon, she has not been able to eat or sleep well, and that she suffers from nightmares about the event. She asks what tort causes of action would assist her.

Discuss: PAT vs. DAVE

Assignment: Negligence Case — Analysis

Familiarity with the elements of negligence is crucial to the personal injury paralegal’s knowledge base. Also important to any paralegal’s tool box of skills are legal research and writing. The following scenario will help you exercise those skills by applying what you have learned in this week’s lectures and materials.

A state statute allows handgun owners to carry concealed handguns on the condition that the handgun owners obtain a permit from the county sheriff for the county in which they reside. The sheriff is prohibited from issuing a permit for a period of three days after receiving the application. Sheriffs cannot issue a permit to a minor, a felon, or a person who is or has undergone treatment for any psychiatric condition.

Alan Allen, aged 32, applies to the sheriff for a permit. He and the sheriff are friends, so the sheriff issues the permit without waiting three days or asking Allen if he has or is undergoing treatment for any psychiatric condition. In fact, Allen has been treated for severe depression and currently is taking medication for the same. Allen goes to a local tavern for a drink, gets into a fight with Chuck Charles, and pulls his gun, intending to frighten him. The gun fires, hits and shatters a bottle behind the bar, sending shards of glass flying. A piece of glass lodges in Chuck Charles’ eye, blinding him in one eye.

Draft an internal memorandum on the case to your attorney. Make sure to find primary sources of law, such as cases and statutes on point. You can use the law of your state, even if it differs somewhat from the fictitious state statute mentioned in the fact pattern. CITE ALL SOURCES using the BLUEBOOK format. Address in the memo the following questions:

• Are the sheriff’s actions negligent?
• If so, is that negligence the proximate cause of Charles’ injury?
• Was it foreseeable that the sheriff’s failure to question Allen on his psychiatric history would result in the injury to Charles?
• What is sovereign immunity, and will it offer any protection to the sheriff?

Name your file SUO_LGS1004_W2_A2_Freres_J

What do you think of the serial killer Ice Man? What did you learn? Write a five-paragraph discussion on this. The first paragraph is your opening and the last paragraph is your conclusions. In between, write three paragraphs, each addressing something you learned in detail. What is the lesson? Why is it important? As criminal justice professional, how will you use this lesson? And more

I don’t know the new studypool works but I need a 5 page paper on a movie called the iceman link to the movie is below

I am doing a project that is split into two parts 1 a Power Point and A Essay. We have to find the negatives and positive and the reason why we selected that topic to research on . I uploaded the instructions for you guys.

QUESTION 1

1. Federal trademark protection is provided by which law?

   		The Lanham Act.
   		The UCC.
   		The U.S. Constitution.
   		Common law.

2.5 points

QUESTION 2

1. Employment discrimination on the basis of age may be prohibited under:

   		the ADA.
   		the Civil Rights Act.
   		the Fair Labor Standards Act.
   		the ADEA.

2.5 points

QUESTION 3

1. Companies are generally:

   		required to obtain worker’s compensation insurance for their employees and independent contractors.
   		required to obtain worker’s compensation insurance for their employees.
   		provided with worker’s compensation insurance by the government of the state in which they operate.
   		provided with worker’s compensation insurance by the Federal government.

2.5 points

QUESTION 4

1. A warranty that comes into existence because of the conduct (like a website photo) of the seller, but not because the terms were stated expressly seller would be called:

   		an oral warranty.
   		an express warranty.
   		a written warranty.
   		an implied warranty.

2.5 points

QUESTION 5

1. The defense of Comparative Negligence is available in a case of:

   		Negligence.
   		Breach of contact.
   		Strict Liablity.
   		Both A. and B. are correct.
   		Both B. and C. are correct.

2.5 points

QUESTION 6

1. The Civil Rights Act:

   		Â prohibits reverse discrimination and prohibits affirmative action.
   		Â prohibits discrimination, but requires reverse discrimination.
   		Â prohibits discrimination, but requires affirmative action.
   		Â prohibits reverse discrimination, but permits affirmative action.

2.5 points

QUESTION 7

1. The defense of Assumption of Risk is available in a case of :

   		Negligence.
   		Breach of contact.
   		Strict Liablity.
   		Both a. and c. are correct.
   		Both b. and c. are correct.

2.5 points

QUESTION 8

1. Employees of the Hefner Concrete Company work long and hard when on road building projects in order to take advantage of good weather and to meet performance bonuses for completion of jobs ahead of schedule. During one week, some of the employees work 55 hours. For the employees who worked 55 hours in one week, Hefner

   		Â must pay its workers time and a half for all hours from 41 through 50 and double time for all hours over 50.
   		Â has violated the FLSA because workers are prohibited from working over 50 hours per week.
   		Â has violated the OSHA because workers are prohibited from working over 50 hours per week.
   		must pay its workers time and a half for all hours over 40.

2.5 points

QUESTION 9

1. Which of the following theories of product liability would not require proof of foreseeable harm:

   		Negligence.
   		Breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
   		Strict Product Liability.
   		All of the above.

2.5 points

QUESTION 10

1. A disclaimer of a warranty by the seller will not be effective in disclaiming:

   		a written express warranty.
   		an express warranty created by a photo on a website.
   		an implied warranty of merchantability.
   		an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.

2.5 points

QUESTION 11

1. Strict Products Liabilty requires the following element(s):

   		A duty owed to the plaintiff and that the product has a defect.
   		That the product has a defect.
   		That the product has a dangerous defect.
   		That the defendant acted unreasonably under the circumstances.

2.5 points

QUESTION 12

1. The following statement is FALSE as to trademarks which are generally protected under Federal Trademark law?

   		Fanciful and arbitrary marks are protected, but descriptive marks are not.
   		Arbitrary marks are protected, but suggestive marks are not.
   		Suggestive and fanciful marks are protected.
   		Fanciful, suggestive, and arbitrary marks are protected.

2.5 points

QUESTION 13

1. A child trespasser on your business premises, is owed:

   		a duty not to intentionally harm
   		a duty not to recklessly harm
   		a duty to protect from any foreseeable dangerous condition
   		no duty at all.

2.5 points

QUESTION 14

1. A defendant could be liable for gross negligence if he was found to have acted:

   		unreasonably
   		intentionally
   		recklessly
   		with criminal intent

2.5 points

QUESTION 15

1. One difference between a “Term” employee and an “At Will” employee is:

   		Term employees have a contract with their employer, but At Will employees do not.
   		Term employees can quit or be fired at any time for no reason but if an At Will employee quits or is fired for no reason, that action can result in a breach of contract lawsuit.
   		At Will employees have a contract with their employer, but Term employees do not.
   		At Will employees can quit or be fired at any time for no reason but if a Term employee quits or is fired for no reason, that action can result in a breach of contract lawsuit.

2.5 points

QUESTION 16

1. The Fair Labor Standards Act regulates the following:

   		Minimum wage provisions
   		Overtime wages and a standard workweek.
   		Child labor.
   		All of the above.
   		None of the above

2.5 points

QUESTION 17

1. An employer will NOT be liable for sexual harassment if:

   		They knew of the existence of hostile environment harassment and did nothing to try to stop it.
   		They knew of the existence of quid pro quo harassment and did nothing to try to stop it.
   		They did not know of the existence of quid pro quo harassment and did nothing to try to stop it.
   		They did not know of the existence of hostile environment harassment and did nothing to try to stop it.

2.5 points

QUESTION 18

1. A product trademark that is identified by a made-up word (one that has no meaning otherwise), is called:

   		Fanciful.
   		Arbitrary.
   		Suggestive.
   		Descriptive.

2.5 points

QUESTION 19

1. To succeed in a strict products liability action, the plaintiff must prove all of the following elements, EXCEPT for which one?

   		The product was defective when sold.
   		The defect rendered the product dangerous.
   		The defendant acted unreasonably.
   		The product was the cause of the plaintiff’s injury.

2.5 points

QUESTION 20

1. Gross Negligence is defined as:

   		Unreasonable action that results in foreseeable harm.
   		Reckless action that result in any harm.
   		Action that is so inherently dangerous that no amount of due care can make it safe.
   		Reckless action that result in foreseeable harm.

2.5 points

QUESTION 21

1. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, an employee can get leave for:
   I. The birth or adoption of a child.
   II. A serious health condition of the employeeâ s sister.
   III. A serious health condition of the employeeâ s wife.
   IV. A serious health condition of the employeeâ s parent
   V. A serious health condition of the employeeâ s boyfriend or girlfriend.

   		I only.
   		I, II, and III only.
   		I, III, and IV only.
   		All of the choices (I through V) are correct.
   		None of the choices (I through V) are correct.

2.5 points

QUESTION 22

1. A restaurant bouncer (security guard), who is employed by the restaurant, hurt a customer by using too much force to eject them from the premises. The bouncer is liable for the customerâ s injuries. Even though the restaurant did not authorize the bouncerâ s conduct, the restaurant may also be liable under the concept of:

   		Contributory negligence.
   		Strict Liability.
   		The restaurant would not be liable at all, since it didnâ t do anything wrong.
   		Breach of Contract.
   		Respondeat Superior.

2.5 points

QUESTION 23

1. Employees are entitled to have their workplace be free from hazards that me cause them harm. The law that regulates workplace safety and safety guidelines is:

   		OSHA.
   		The Lanham Act.
   		The FLSA.
   		The FMLA.
   		The UCC.

2.5 points

QUESTION 24

1. The Civil Rights Act’s ban on racial discrimination

   		Â Can be used to protect black people only.
   		Â Can be used to protect black and asian people only.
   		Â Can be used to protect all citizens equally on the basis of race.
   		Â Can be used to protect only to people of color.

2.5 points

QUESTION 25

1. A BFOQ defense:

   		is a potential defense in any employment discrimination case.
   		is a potential defense in a â disparate impactâ employment discrimination case.
   		is a potential defense in a â disparate treatmentâ employment discrimination case.
   		is a potential defense, but only in cases involving discrimination on the basis of sex.

2.5 points

QUESTION 26

1. Which of the following theories of product liability would require proof of privity of contract:

   		Breach of express warranty.
   		Breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
   		Strict Product Liability.
   		Negligence.
   		All of the above.

2.5 points

QUESTION 27

1. Assuming the conduct is repetitive and unwelcome, an employer’s sexual harassment liability may arise from:

   		a female worker overhearing a male worker telling a sexually-offensive joke to a male co-worker.
   		a female supervisor pinches the rear end of a male employee.
   		a male worker being subjected to a new employee hazing ritual that involves sexually-offensive behavior.
   		All of the above.

2.5 points

QUESTION 28

1. Henri runs a French restaurant. He wants his diners to have an authentic culinary experience. Henri can avoid a claim of national origin discrimination and still screen his waitstaff by requiring that

   		an applicant speak French well, or have knowledge of French cuisine.
   		an applicant have a French passport.
   		an applicant be born in France.
   		an applicant have at least one cousin, parent or grandparent who comes from France.

2.5 points

QUESTION 29

1. Unemployment benefits would be payable to an employee who:

   		was terminated for violating agreed-to company policies prohibiting criticizing their employer in social media.
   		was terminated because they physically assaulted their supervisor.
   		was terminated because they refused to work a shift change after they have worked the same shift for 10 years.
   		was terminated because they testified against the employer in another employee’s discrimination case against that same employer.

2.5 points

QUESTION 30

1. The Implied Warranty of Merchantability would arise in a transaction where:

   		land was being sold by a real estate agency.
   		a car is being sold by a car dealership.
   		a car dealer is redecorating and selling off some of its furniture to consumers and other businesses.
   		a home-owner is selling his used car to his neighbor.

2.5 points

QUESTION 31

1. The following is true:

   		A successful contributory negligence defense divides the blame between the parties and allows the plaintiff to still recover damages.
   		A successful contributory negligence defense would be a full defense and the plaintif would recover no damages.
   		Contributory negligence defense is the majority rule.
   		None of the above are true.

2.5 points

QUESTION 32

1. In a lawsuit based upon negligence, the following remedies may generally be recoverable:

   		Specific performance.
   		Punitive damages.
   		Liquidated damages
   		All of the above.
   		None of the above.

2.5 points

QUESTION 33

1. Under the FMLA, an employee would be entitled to:

   		up to 12 weeks of leave per year.
   		up to 12 weeks of leave per year, but only if they are consecutive.
   		up to 10 weeks of leave per year.
   		up to 10 weeks of leave per year, but only if they are consecutive.

2.5 points

QUESTION 34

1. If an employee needs to take 10 weeks of leave for a required surgery and recovery, they would be entitled:

   		to get their job back after their leave.
   		to disabilty payment benefits under Social Security for the time they couldn’t work.
   		to unemployment payment benefits for the time they couldn’t work.
   		None of the above are true.

2.5 points

QUESTION 35

1. Worker’s Compensation:

   		only pays benefits to workers who are injured inside the employer’s place of business.
   		pays benefits to workers who suffer a work-related injury.
   		pays benefits to workers who get hurt at work or at home, and therefore cannot work.
   		pays benefits to workers who want to take a vacation.

2.5 points

QUESTION 36

1. The employment-at-will doctrine means that

   		An actor must agree to follow the instructions by the play’s director in order to be cast in a play by William Shakespeare.
   		Highly paid workers in the building trades can pass their jobs on to a relative when they die.
   		An employer can terminate an employee for any reason as long as the reason is not a violation of public policy or law.
   		Government employees lose their constitutional rights when on the job.

2.5 points

QUESTION 37

1. The following is an example of quid pro quo sexual harassment.

   		A male employee tells dirty jokes to a female superior.
   		A male employee grabs a male co-worker in an inappropriate manner.
   		A female manager refuses to hire a potential employee, unless the new employee agrees to have an affair with the manager.
   		A worker has a provocative photo of his spouse on his cell-phone and shows it to his co-workers.

2.5 points

QUESTION 38

1. A day care center hired a convicted child molester to take care of the children, without doing the required background check. The molester then attacked one of the children and the parents are suing the day care center. The day care center:

   		Would be liable under respondeat superior.
   		Would be liable for its own negligent conduct.
   		Would be liable due to its comparative negligence.
   		Would not be liable because the parents assumed the risk of harm.
   		Would not be liable in any or all of the above events.

2.5 points

QUESTION 39

1. Social Security can pay a benefit:

   		To a wage-earner who retires and has reached the age set by statutory law.
   		To a wage-earner who becomes fully and permanently disabled.
   		To the survivor of a wage-earner who is entitled to a social security benefit.
   		All of the above may be entitled to benefits under Social Security.
   		None of the above may be entitled to benefits under Social Security.

2.5 points

QUESTION 40

1. Under the FLSA, children are protected from:

   		working too many hours.
   		working in a job that may put them in danger.
   		working certain hours that may cause them harm or interfere with their education.
   		All of the above are correct.
   		None of the above are correct.

2.5 points