A good explanation to these questions, provide text evidence from the pictures I have uploaded, and from other sources such as an article with direct quotes, and post the link. NO PLAGIARISM PLEASE.  

1.)  Is it good community policing policy to assign white officers to “white ” areas of San Antonio; brown officers to “brown” areas; black officers to “black” areas?  Explain.

2.)  Would this policy automatically result in greater understanding and cooperation between the police and citizens?  Explain.

the name of the book is called ,”essentials of criminal justice, author, larry j siegel, john L. worrall

11th edition. 

this is en example, What I mostly agree with is the Equal Justice Perspective because it gives fairness to all people that they should have the exact treatment under the law and should evaluate based on their actual behavior, not on what they have done in the past. It also expects the judges to be fair because they play an important role in criminal justice. System. They make decisions that profoundly affect peoples’ lives and their livelihoods. The Equal Justice Perspective plays a significant role in the American Justice system to dispense fairly and to be equal to those who come before the law, and people should receive equal treatment for equal crimes that they have committed. As it states in the book Essentials of Criminal Justice,” “there has been convicted of a particular crime receives equal punishment.” I have also read the article, “Judges Should Strive to Provide Equal Justice Under Law, “Since judicial bias significantly interferes with judges’ abilities to perform the duties our society expects of them, it seems obvious that they should do anything and everything possible to reduce their biases. It explains how judges play an important role in the justice system in our society to make equal decisions for all citizens.

Link: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/empathy-and-relationships/201702/judges-should-strive-provide-equal-justice-under-law (Links to an external site.)

MLA- Article Title, “Judges Should Strive to Provide Equal Justice Under Law”, Website Title,” psychology today, date accessed June 07,2021.

2- The perspective I disagree with is Rehabilitation because the individual who committed a crime should receive punishment rather than going to rehab programs. They will have the best understanding and rethink what they did was wrongdoing. It would be a life lesson for them and society when someone tries to commit a crime. Some mistakes do not have a second chance. For instance, someone who rapes others and a serial killer because they might have a psychiatric illness which rehabilitation would not benefit them they do not have control of themselves, therefore, it is better to punish them with prison. As it states in the book Essentials of Criminal Justice, “violent killers such as James Holmes, seem mentally and emotionally unstable. I have read an article about psychiatrist crimes that explained why the suspect should be punished to prevent conditioned in public. “Although this outcome may be legally possible if the mental state of the patient has improved, potential danger and threats to public safety remain primary concerns, not releasing the patient from responsibility because of mental illness, even in situations when it might be appropriate.”

Link: http://jaapl.org/content/38/1/100 (Links to an external site.)

MLA: Article title,” Mentally III persons who commit crimes: punishment or treatment? Website title, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law” date published March 01, 2010, date accessed June 07, 2021. 

I’m working on a criminal justice discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

create a conclusion to the following text:

Organizational Behavior Concepts

Within a law enforcement establishment, the general organizational behavior concepts used consist of administration, development, structuring, leadership, and monitoring, Administration is the idea of instructing individuals to effectively accomplish the ambitions of the division in an operative technique. “These outcomes come through the intermediate outcomes of employee experiences of calling and membership” (Pawar, 2009). Development is the idea of creating a strategy for establishing and accomplishing objectives. Structuring happens when collecting information is used to effectively gather the objectives. With that, the idea of leadership is a method of encouraging individuals to accomplish responsibilities that will permit for the objectives to be seen. Lastly, monitoring is the idea of developing the value and amount of the organization used to attain the objectives.

Professional Standards and Values

Professional Standards and values are implemented in management followed in the criminal justice day-to-day procedures. Professional standards applied in criminal justice are to serve and protect the publics interest, integrity, professionalism, respect and protect human dignity and human rights, ensure fair, firm, and consistent upholding of the laws, and professional confidentiality. When employees are found not abiding and following these standards disciplinary action is given as a reprimand (ACLU,2010). Values integrity, truthfulness, protect and serve the community, leadership, and respect of people. As employees represent the upholding of laws by serving in the criminal justice department they must follow and demonstrate each standard and value as a part of their day-to-day job. When employees are found out of compliance with these standards disciplinary action is followed.

Common managerial practices

Criminal justice agencies like many organizations must adapt different kinds of management to achieve their mission set out such as crime prevention, adjudication of criminal offenses, and punishment of offenders. Three common forms of management used in the criminal justice system are scientific management, human relations management, and systems management. The scientific management model was created by Fredrick Taylor in the 1940’s which emphasized in developing routines to carry out tasks, train workers for routines and to match workers with appropriate job assignments and tasks. Scientific management would be commonly used by police and prisons where the hierarchical system is commonly used. This model allows officers to work their way through the ranking system to gain more overall knowledge, instead of giving the responsibility to a higher ranked officer already. Human relations management is the next theory commonly used. Human relations emphasize morale, values, and feelings of workers to make them feel like important aspects of the team. Also known as the demographic or participatory management, supervisors act as mentors to aid officers instead of micromanaging them. Typically, this type of management often butts heads with the hierarchical style communication, so police and prisons do not use this method as much. Systems management is the final method we will talk about. Systems management requires a great amount of organizational leadership and knowledge. In this system management must recognize and understand different perspectives, and functions based off the information they gather from data and employees. System management also includes specialization of different components within a department such as homicide unit and gang enforcement that is commonly used in the larger criminal justice departments.

Review the archived local media reports of the downfall of Judge Richard Baumgartner and the fall out of his judicial misconduct in the Christan-Newsom murder cases.

Why do you think his misconduct on the bench went unreported by other court personnel?

Do you think the legal and career consequences he suffered are adequate for what he has admitted to doing?

1. Who do you think, other than the judge, should be held responsible for the outcome of this situation?
2. Summarize briefly what the effect has been on the cases tried by Judge Baumgartner.
3. What safeguards do you think could be put in place to prevent a similar event?

Week 6 Assignment – Cybercrime Tools

As a cybercrime professional you have many tools in your arsenal to stop network, DOS and/or Windows attacks.

Read the article, 21 Best Free Digital Forensic Investigation Tools, which briefly describes many of the tools.

Select two forensic investigator tools from the list below:

• Autopsy.
• Magnet Encrypted Disk Detector.
• Wireshark.
• Magnet RAM Capture.
• Network Miner.
• NMAP.
• RAM Capturer.
• FAW Forensics Acquisition of Websites (This is a tool to acquire Web pages for forensic investigation).
• HashMyFiles.
• CrowdResponse.
• ExifTool.
• SIFT.
• Browser History Capturer and Browser History viewer by Foxton.
• Sleuth Kit.
• CAINE.
• Volatility Framework.
• Paladin Forensic Suite.
• FTK Imager.
• Bulk_Extractor.
• LastActivityView.
• FireEye RedLine.

Write a 1–2 page paper in which you compare and contrast the two tools you have selected:

• Describe the tools you have selected:
  • How do each of the tools work?
  • How are they different from each other?
• Why do you believe that these two tools are the best choice to stop network, DOS, and/or Windows attacks? Provide a rationale.
• Describe an event or instance when one of these tools is the superior counter measure.
• Use three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

• Describe network attacks and suggest countermeasures.

Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2017). Criminal courts: A contemporary perspective (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Chapter 6, “Prosecutors” (pp. 155–188)Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2016). Criminal Courts: A Contemporary Perspective. Copyright 2016 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.   

Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2017). Criminal courts: A contemporary perspective (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Chapter 7, “Defense Attorneys” (pp. 189–222)Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2016). Criminal Courts: A Contemporary Perspective. Copyright 2016 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.   

Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2017). Criminal courts: A contemporary perspective (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Chapter 8, “Judges” (pp. 223–250)Hemmens, C., Brody, D. C., & Spohn, C. (2016). Criminal Courts: A Contemporary Perspective. Copyright 2016 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.   

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Courts and Judicial Process, Week 3 (PDF)

Required Media

Serial Productions (Producer). (2018b). Serial: Pleas baby pleas [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://serialpodcast.org/season-three/5/pleas-bab…

Assignment: Roles in the Judicial System

Our trial continues with the defense attorney advocating for the charged and the prosecutor advancing evidence to prove a crime and provide justice for a victim. Witnesses are called and cross-examined. The judge follows standards, process, and precedent to keep all parties on track and within legal boundaries. The jury listens, following each argument and weighing the evidence. A process unfolds as it has over and over—each participant fulfilling a role in a democratic process. In this Assignment, you holistically consider those key roles in the judicial system.

To prepare:

• Read the Week 3 case study found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Courts and Judicial Process, Week 3 document.

By Day 7

Write a 750- to 1,000-page paper that addresses the points below.

In your response, point to details from the case studies to provide examples of role characteristics in practice. You also may predict next steps for each role or discuss how an element of power in that role will come to bear on a predicted aspect of the case. Be sure to draw upon examples from the Learning Resources to support your response, especially when predicting or discussing next steps.

• What is the judge’s power, and how is it used?
• What is the prosecutor’s power, and how is it used?
• What is the defense attorney’s power, and how is it used?
• What is the relationship between the judge, prosecutor, defense, and police?
• What is the duty of a jury?
• How does the power of different judicial system roles vary in other countries? Are there any best practices that could apply in the U.S. judicial system? Explain how.

Abel, J. (2017). Cops and pleas: Police officers’ influence on plea bargaining. Yale Law Journal, 126(6), 1730–1787.

U.S. Department of Justice: Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2011). Plea and charge bargaining: Research summary. Retrieved from https://www.bja.gov/Publications/PleaBargainingRes…

Griffin, L. K. (2017). State Incentives, plea bargaining regulation, and the failed market for indigent defense. Law & Contemporary Problems, 80(1), 83–105.

Etienne, M. (2017). A lost opportunity for sentencing reform: Plea bargaining and barriers to effective assistance. South Carolina Law Review, 68(3), 467–486.

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Courts and Judicial Process, Week 2 (PDF

Assignment: Choices in the Judicial System

Reflect on the two scenarios from the weekly Introduction. Now, imagine that you are the law enforcement officer who either cracked the big case and brought down a big cartel or who dutifully pursued the smaller case to find justice for an aggrieved family. In both circumstances, you feel strongly that the DA should fully prosecute each case. How would you convince your commanding officer to advocate with you to the DA? In this Assignment, you take on that perspective when providing a rationale to prosecute based on a case study.

To prepare:

• Read the Week 2 case study found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Courts and Judicial Process, Week 2 document.

By Day 7

Write a 750- to 1,000-word brief that provides the rationale for taking the case in the case study to trial. In your brief, address the following:

• What are the charges?
• What is the reasoning behind the charges?
• Which court(s) can or should be solicited?
• What is the reasoning for choosing that court?
  • Note: Most importantly, a plea deal is not an option in this situation.
• Provide your reasoning for why you would not take an alternate path, such as a particular court.
• Provide your reasoning for why a plea deal is not appropriate.
• Your role is the investigator and your audience for the brief is the commanding officer.
• Be sure to draw upon examples from the case study and Learning Resources to support your response.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Required Media

Serial Productions (Producer). (2018b). Serial: Pleas baby pleas [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://serialpodcast.org/season-three/5/pleas-bab…

Discussion: The Judge

The judge now commands everyone to be seated. The trial may proceed.

But how that trial proceeds may have been decided before anyone entered the room. Was a plea deal reached? Is the judge bound by sentencing guidelines? How much power does the judge really have these days? If the judge’s role has changed, how does it differ from bygone eras or original visions of judicial power? In this Discussion, you consider similar questions.

By Day 3

Post a response to the following:

• Despite changes in who holds the most power, explain why the judge receives the most deference.
• In your response, be sure to incorporate historical influence, institutional practices, and/or political factors to support your position.
• In your response, you may incorporate professional experience or insights.

By Day 5

Respond to two colleagues:

• Choose a response that is different from your own.
• Explain how your colleague’s position has changed your perception or understanding.

Reid, S. T. (2016). Criminal law: The essentials (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Chapter 4, “Defenses to Criminal Culpability” (pp. 70–88)Criminal Law: The Essentials, 3rd Edition by Reid, S. T. Copyright 2016 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center

Lippman, M. (2018). Contemporary criminal law: Concepts, cases, and controversies (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 6, “Criminal Defenses: Justifications and Excuses” (pp. 113–154)Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 5th Edition by Lippman, M. Copyright 2018 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Lippman, M. (2018). Contemporary criminal law: Concepts, cases, and controversies (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 8, “Justifications”“Self Defense” through the Section 3.04 box (p. 198)
“Defense of Others” (p. 216)
“Chapter Summary” (p. 245)Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 5th Edition by Lippman, M. Copyright 2018 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Lippman, M. (2018). Contemporary criminal law: Concepts, cases, and controversies (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 9, “Excuses”“The Insanity Defense” through “The Right-Wrong Test” (pp. 247–249)
“The Irresistible Impulse Test” (p. 251)
“The Substantial Capacity Test” through “The Future of the Insanity Defense” (pp. 252–253)
“Diminished Capacity” (p. 258)
“Intoxication” through “Involuntary Intoxication” (pp. 260–261)Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 5th Edition by Lippman, M. Copyright 2018 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Document: Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law, Week 3 (PDF)

Assignment: Classifications of Defense

Imagine a police detective investigating the crime of a young woman who severely maims an older man. The young woman does not explain why she stabbed the man; rather, she is in profound shock and remains silent. If the detective had no awareness of the signs of post-traumatic stress disorder, the detective might not have pursued a line of questioning leading to a revelation: the man had abused the young woman when she was a girl. The circumstance could lead to a plausible defense.

Criminal justice professionals must understand defense classifications in order to fulfill their roles. In this Assignment, you review scenarios for an applicable defense.

To prepare:

• Read the Week 3 case studies found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law, Week 3 document.
• This Assignment requires you to apply your learning to all case studies in the document.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Write a 500- to 750-word paper that addresses the following for each of the five cases:

• What is the actus reus, or the action that caused harm?
• What is the mens rea, or the intent of the person who caused the harm? Be sure to discuss the level of mens rea (purposeful, knowing, reckless, and negligent) and explain how you came to this conclusion.
• Is there concurrence? Did the actus reus and the mens rea occur together?
• Which excusable or justifiable defense could be applied to this case? What information from the scenario led you to this conclusion?

Lippman, M. (2018). Contemporary criminal law: Concepts, cases, and controversies (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 8, “Justifications” (pp. 196–199)Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 5th Edition by Lippman, M. Copyright 2018 by Sage Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

LII / Legal Information Institute (17 Sept. 2009.). Probable cause. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/probable_cause 

Reid, S. T. (2016). Criminal law: The essentials (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Chapter 2, “Elements of a Crime” (pp. 35–36, the “Causation” section)Criminal Law: The Essentials, 3rd Edition by Reid, S. T. Copyright 2016 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Illinois Legal Aid Online. (n.d.). Difference between dismissed with or without prejudice. Retrieved November 4, 2018, from https://www.illinoislegalaid.org/legal-information… 

Vera, A. (2018, July 25). Florida man could avoid charges in fatal shooting because of ‘stand your ground’ law. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/23/us/florida-stand-yo… 

NOLO. (n.d.). Arrests that don’t result in criminal charges. Retrieved November 4, 2018, from https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/arrests-th… 

Scott Baio will not face Nicole Eggert’s sexual assault charges, prosecutors say. (2018, June 19). USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/06… 

Britt, S. (2018, April 19). Judge rejects Missouri governor’s bid to dismiss criminal case. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-missouri-govern… 

Document: Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law, Week 2 (PDF)

Document: Arrest Report Template (Word document)