Category: Humanities Homework Help

Watch Part 1 of the Documentary and write a one-page (double-spaced) reflection piece on it based on what you’ve learned in the course this quarter.
Source link:

VIDEO

Imagine you are a member of the Society for Social Work and Research (SSWR), a professional organization for researchers in social work. In your own words, prepare a hypothetical blog post for the organization’s home page for other social work researchers to read and respond to. For your blog, analyze the questions below.

• What role do statistics play in social work research? Do you believe they are simply superfluous (an unnecessary burden) or are they useful? On what do you base your opinion?
• Some argue that outliers should be eliminated from results. Do you agree or disagree with this approach? Why or why not? How do oppressed, marginalized, and vulnerable populations correspond to the notion of outliers?

Length of blog: 3-5 pages, not including title and reference pages. Support your blog with at least three scholarly sources.

Your blog must be effectively designed and meet the following criteria:

1. Contains text that is readable (e.g., appropriate size of font, type of font, contrasts with the background, contains sufficient white space),
2. Includes information within the blog that supports the assignment.
3. Ensures any included links are active and work.
4. Contains at least one graphic.
5. Uses the same template throughout the blog with a consistent design.

Your blog should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your submission should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards where appropriate. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

Preliminary Suppositions and Implications ( one page – 10 points) Just because you don’t have to actually conduct the study and analyze the results, doesn’t mean you can skip talking about the analytical process and potential implications. The purpose of this section is to argue how and in what ways you believe your research will refine, revise, or extend existing knowledge in the subject area under investigation. Depending on the aims and objectives of your study, describe how the anticipated results will impact future scholarly research, theory, practice, forms of interventions, or policymaking. Note that such discussions may have either substantive [a potential new policy], theoretical [a potential new understanding], or methodological [a potential new way of analyzing] significance.

When thinking about the potential implications of your study, ask the following questions:

• What might the results mean in regards to challenging the theoretical framework and underlying assumptions that support the study?
• What suggestions for subsequent research could arise from the potential outcomes of the study?
• What will the results mean to practitioners in the natural settings of their workplace?
• Will the results influence programs, methods, and/or forms of intervention?
• How might the results contribute to the solution of social, economic, or other types of problems?
• Will the results influence policy decisions?
• In what way do individuals or groups benefit should your study be pursued?
• What will be improved or changed as a result of the proposed research?
• How will the results of the study be implemented and what innovations or transformative insights could emerge from the process of implementation?

NOTE: This section should not delve into idle speculation, opinion, or be formulated on the basis of unclear evidence. The purpose is to reflect upon gaps or understudied areas of the current literature and describe how your proposed research contributes to a new understanding of the research problem should the study be implemented as designed.

1. Read the article: Can People Lie with Statistics? (Links to an external site.) (Link will open in new tab.)
2. Answer all three questions under “What Do You Think” in your essay

Introduction

A consulting plan or report never is finished after the first draft. Iteration happens as the project continues and as the consultant collects more information from the client.

To finish your consulting plan, apply what you have learned through your assignment feedback, peer feedback, discussions, and research to revise and improve your consulting plan from Unit 5.

Assignment Instructions

Your final paper covers theoretical underpinnings of your consulting approach and evaluates your consulting project. Use the following subheadings from Part 1 of the paper:

• Subheading 1 – Case study.
• Subheading 2 – Discovery Approaches.
• Subheading 3 – Guidelines for Discovery.
• Subheading 4 – Consulting Competencies.

Then expand to add the following components for your final submission:

• Subheading 5 – Implementation Phase/Description of Consulting Theories and Basis in Evidence: In this section, you must identify and describe two existing psychological theories that could inform the way you do the implementation phase of your consultation. You will demonstrate this evidence base through citations of peer-reviewed references for each theory selected. 
  • Select these two theories from the following options: 
    • Systems theory.
    • Positive psychology.
    • Adlerian theory.
    • Gestalt theory.
    • Cognitive-behavioral theory.
  • Explain the psychological underpinnings of each theory as it informs your application of psychological consultation. You will accomplish this by identifying key psychological elements of your theories, describing the roots of the theory in the larger field of psychology, and noting its connections to other theories.
  • Compare and contrast the theories based on their usefulness and basis in evidence. Be sure to cite peer-reviewed journal articles on each theory. Provide enough details that give an in-depth analysis of each model. For example, include your critique of the strengths and limitations of each theory for this particular consultation project. You may choose to incorporate some of the resources and ideas from your Unit 7 discussion posts that focus on analyzing theories.
• Subheading 6 – Synthesis of Consulting Theories: Based on your evaluation of theories, create a synthesis that integrates the effective key concepts and best aspects of the methods related to each theory. Discuss the ways each theory might inform your approach to the steps you take in the consultation.
• Subheading 7 – Evaluation of the Consulting Project: You may choose to include some of the resources and ideas from your Unit 6 discussion post that are relevant to evaluation approaches in consultation. Describe the process you would use to evaluate your work as a consultant for this case. This should include: 
  • An in-depth discussion of the evaluation processes you could use for this consultation.
  • A comparison and contrast of two possible approaches to evaluating the project and the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to evaluation
• Subheading 8 – Conclusion/Synthesis:Conclude with a succinct synthesis, taking the best from each approach to evaluation.

1. First, how did the Indian Removal plans/policies emerge based on this week and last week’s materials? 

2. Next, please rhetorically analyze Andrew Jackson’s speeches (inaugural and second annual message.) How would you describe the overall language/tone Jackson uses in his speeches? How does his language/tone change with each speech? Who is his intended audience in each speech, and what are his goals regarding dealings with American Indian tribes? What kind of patterns or trajectory do you notice?

3. After, please rhetorically analyze Andrew Jackson’s” Letter to the Cherokee”. Who was the intended audience, and what was the purpose? How would you describe his tone and word choice? What historical allusions does he use? What were some key quotes/parts that stood out to you, and why?

4. What aspects of the chapter “Jackson’s White Republic” stood out to you? What, in your opinion, was a key passage or quote, and why?

5. Lastly, please share your overall thoughts/reactions/connections to this week’s materials 

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need guidance to help me learn.

According to the book and class lecture, what is social stratification and how is the U.S. stratified today? (1page)

And what is global stratification and how is the globe stratified today? How is global stratification related to race and gender? The Coronavirus pandemic? (1 page)I will provide the book and class Notes

After reading Conrad’s “The Task of the Artist,” respond to the following prompt:

Conrad outlines his notion of the role of the writer as artist and the role of writing in society. In your initial post, explain your understanding of Conrad’s definition of the artist’s task and then apply it in relation to Hardy’s poem “The Darkling Thrush ” which we read on the first day. In your analysis of the poem, discuss the theme, imagery, and diction as support for your interpretation. Response parameters: A minimum of 250 words. Use only provided references I attached.

I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.

Option A: The Vikings (Links to an external site.) were more than marauders, although they did rape, pillage, and plunder parts of Europe and strike fear into the hearts of many. Discuss Viking cultur (Links to an external site.)e (you may choose to discuss any/all: religion (Links to an external site.), war (Links to an external site.), economy, women (Links to an external site.), life styles). Why did the Vikings move from their homes, how did they do so and why were they so successful, and what occurred as a result in a few specific areas (you may choose from England, France, the Byzantine world, Ireland, Greenland, or Russia). You do not need to respond to anyone unless you want.

Option B: Discuss the term renaissance (what does it mean?) and the development of the Italian Renaissance (Links to an external site.).  Describe its features and some of its notable figures – artistic (Links to an external site.) and literary (Links to an external site.).  What is new about this time and what themes are based on past art, architecture, and literature? What relationship does the Italian renaissance have to the Protestant reformations (Links to an external site.)?