Health Medical Homework Help. BIO 603 St Thomas University Vital Organs and Unconscious State Paper
Vital Organs / Unconscious State
- Name some very important organs that are not vital organs.
- List the functional description of all the normal vital organs, including today’s exceptions.
- Is it possible to live without a vital organ? Why? Example?
- Distinction between assisting or substituting vital organs. Bioethical analysis.
- Do the following practices assist or substitute the vital organ? Why?
- Dialysis
- Respirator
- Ventilator
- Tracheotomy
- CPR
- Read and summarize ERD PART FIVE Introduction.
- Unconscious state: Definition.
- Clinical definitions of different states of unconsciousness: Compare and contrast
- Benefit vs Burden: bioethical analysis.
Submission Instructions:
- The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
- If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style. Refer to your syllabus for further detail or contact your instructor.
- Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Wednesday
- Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
- You can expect feedback and grading from the instructor before the next assignment is due.
- Read
- Ethical and Religious Directives (ERD) for Catholic Health Care Services (6th ed.). (2018).
PART FIVE: Introduction - Watch
- Cioffi, A. (2019, March 9). BIO 603 VITAL ORGANS ASSIST SUBST 3 9 19 [Video file]. Retrieved from BIO 603 VITAL ORGANS ASSIST SUBST 3 9 19 (Links to an external site.)
- Cioffi, A. (2019, March 24). BIO 603 UNCONSCIOUS 3 23 19 [Video file]. Retrieved from BIO 603 UNCONSCIOUS 3 23 19 (Links to an external site.)
- Essay/Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsIdentification of Main Issues/Problems
view longer description
30 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
27 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
26 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrates a fair understanding of most of the issues/problems.
24 pts
Acceptable
Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most of the issues/problems.
21 pts
Unacceptable
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
/ 30 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
view longer description
25 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
23 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
21 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
19 pts
Acceptable
Presents an acceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
17 pts
Unacceptable
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
/ 25 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
view longer description
25 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
23 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
20 pts
Fair
Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
18 pts
Acceptable
Provides acceptable responses to all issues/problems, lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
17 pts
Unacceptable
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
/ 25 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
view longer description
10 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
8 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
6 pts
Fair
Superficially uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
4 pts
Acceptable
Acceptable uses of the literature and other resources to inform their work. Lack of use of citations and extended referencing.
2 pts
Unacceptable
Unacceptable uses of the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
/ 10 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
8 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
6 pts
Fair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
4 pts
Acceptable
Demonstrate an acceptable level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
2 pts
Unacceptable
Demonstrates an unacceptable level of writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
/ 10 pts
- Ethical and Religious Directives (ERD) for Catholic Health Care Services (6th ed.). (2018).